| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		news
 
 
  Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 0 Location: Greater Boston
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Renting in Mass
 
 
  Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 381 Location: In a house I bought in December 2011
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:17 pm GMT    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Ouch! And walking away isn't an option in Mass. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		JCK
 
 
  Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:54 pm GMT    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Ouch indeed.
 
 
$120k average?  That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes.
 
 
I wonder what the distribution looks like. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Boston ITer
 
 
  Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 269
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:47 pm GMT    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | JCK wrote: | 	 		  | $120k average?  That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes. | 	  
 
 
If this includes HELOCs, then it makes sense. People lived beyond their means, but then, lost the cushion of rising prices. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		balor123
 
 
  Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:07 am GMT    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| What did the gains look like during the bubble years? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		CL Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		JCK
 
 
  Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:19 pm GMT    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Boston ITer wrote: | 	 		   	  | JCK wrote: | 	 		  | $120k average?  That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes. | 	  
 
 
If this includes HELOCs, then it makes sense. People lived beyond their means, but then, lost the cushion of rising prices. | 	  
 
 
I'm still not buying it.  I'm sure there are folks who are $120k underwater, but it seems pretty hard to do, unless you're in a $800k+ home and your value has absolutely tanked.
 
 
Let's assume you HELOC'd yourself to 100% LTV at the peak.  I'm going to through two test cases here: High value and low value:
 
 
Home worth $600k at peak.  The nominal decline for the high tier in Boston from peak is about 10%, per Case-Shiller.  So that home would be worth $540k today.  That doesn't get you to $120k debt.
 
 
Home worth $300k at peak.  This might be middle tier, but let's assume it's in the low tier, because that has shown a bigger decline.  That home has declined ~30% from peak.  You're still only in the hole by $90k.
 
 
Thus, it's tough to even come up with scenarios where you can be in the hole by $120k, unless you bought a very expensive home that tanked.  I just can't see how that could possibly the average...
 
 
http://blog.redfin.com/boston/2011/04/case-shiller_boston_home_prices_inch_toward_a_post-peak_low.
 
 
I think there's something screwy going on with those numbers. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |