 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:04 pm GMT Post subject: The State of the Nation's Housing 2010 |
|
|
Did we discuss this report last year? I don't remember. The historical information is interesting but I would like to see an updated report for Boston.
Another neat paper from last year
To Preserve and Protect: Land Use Regluations in Weston. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:19 pm GMT Post subject: Re: The State of the Nation's Housing 2010 |
|
|
I know we've discussed that report in the past, though I'm not sure about last year specifically. I definitely remember taking issue with what one of the center's heads, Nicolas Retsinas, has said before. For instance, he said that the Massachusetts housing market would recover in late 2007 or 2008. The bubble era reports from the center were also oblivious and in retrospect probably harmful to anybody who took them seriously. Check out these gems from the 2005 report:
Quote: |
in several metropolitan areas where house prices have appreciated the fastest, natural or regulatory-driven supply constraints may have resulted in permanently higher prices.
|
...and...
Quote: |
For now, though, house prices should keep rising as long as job and income growth continue to offset the recent jump in short- term interest rates.
|
As we know, the housing market crash preceded employment losses and also occurred over a period of declining interest rates.
So not a very good track record there. I seem to remember seeing a list of the center's sponsors at one point and that completely clarified things, but a quick Google search isn't turning that up right now.
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:58 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
It is pretty objective though. I like the history of Weston as it defines the cultural aspect of Boston's housing problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenXer
Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 703
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:30 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
The situation is exactly out of Atlas Shrugged - the producers are leaving the state. The unions are the only ones who'll be left, and then the whole thing will unravel pretty fast. For all the 'jobs' created, Fidelity just took them all out of state - that's over 1000 high paying jobs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:21 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure those jobs were high paying. I think those are in downtown. In any case, they cut a lot more the past few years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenXer
Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 703
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:35 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
The point is that Fidelity had 13k jobs in this state a couple of years ago. Now there are only 8k, and you better believe that they are getting together to move out of this state altogether. Compared to some union jobs, these may not be high paying jobs, but compared to the types of jobs available, Fidelity is a pretty high. Now tell me these are not high paying jobs (I just selected the highest number reported, format - average, low, high):
Senior Software Engineer
76 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$75,710
$62k
$87k
Associate Software Engineer Developer
62 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$58,505
$49k
$65k
Financial Services Representative
53 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$39,810
$33k
$51k
Principal Software Engineer
49 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$91,986
$74k
$110k
Software Engineer/Developer
47 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$62,726
$53k
$74k
Looking for a job? See the latest Jobs in Boston
Director
35 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$111,876
$80k
$135k
Associate Systems Analyst
31 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$59,272
$51k
$66k
Senior Business Analyst
28 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$71,164
$55k
$81k
Systems Analyst
24 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$63,567
$57k
$74k
Vice President
21 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$141,576
$90k
$180k |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boston ITer
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 269
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:30 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I'll tell you one thing about Fidelity and that's that although it was never a *fun* place to work for, it was a type of job market leader for much of the 90s.
In other words, as salaries augmented throughout the decade, in finance vis-a-vis IT, Fidelity was generally considered the higher paymaster in town and as a result, nearby firms like MFS, Putnam, Scudder, Thompson & Thompson, CTP, & even State St, had to start raising salaries to keep up with them. In essence, the delta between Fidelity and other companies was generally considered a *lifestyle* compensation difference where leaving at at let's say 5-5:30PM was 'ok' with minimal OT, as oppose to always sticking around till 6-7PM. The problem with that was that the younger and coming crowd stayed away from the lower paying shops & gravitated towards Fidelity, as either full employees or contractors. This of course all changed course after the Nasdaq/telecom/IT bust. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:51 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah for the most part those salaries don't impress me. Show me jobs that pay less which aren't hourly. We've already seen that the typical teacher in MA makes $80k - $100k. Waltham has over 100 employees who make over $100k. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boston ITer
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 269
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:55 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
balor123 wrote: | Yeah for the most part those salaries don't impress me. Show me jobs that pay less which aren't hourly. We've already seen that the typical teacher in MA makes $80k - $100k. Waltham has over 100 employees who make over $100k. |
But isn't that a part of the phenomena? I've seen those kinds of salaries, ten years ago. The private sector's generally been wage stagnant whereas teachers & other govt employees have been getting cost of living raises continually, regardless of the private sector economy. So a teacher earning $55K in 1999 is clearly in the $73K+ range today whereas the Fidelity guy, if he's not promoted, is probably working elsewhere if he wants a similar payrate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:29 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
We went through this last year. The typical teacher in MA does NOT make 80-100K. Do your research. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:08 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Is Spring is BAAACK the post you are referring to? I think the regulars here know that I do my research so if you're going to make such a claim, be prepared to back it up yourself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:12 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe my statement was a bit generalized. We only discussed unionized teachers in a few districts. The ones I've looked at were Boston, Newton, and Wellesley. I can't speak for other districts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:38 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
You said MA. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenXer
Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 703
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:18 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
it is true that state employees are the ones making the six figure salaries. This can not go on forever. Its called cannibalism. It can only exist when the economy is doing good. I think that even if teachers were making 50k, they'd still come out ahead due to generous pensions. Getting 40-50k a year from pensions for 30+ years is not a bad deal. If your salary is six figures though, those people will get disproportionate pensions that very few rich millionares can afford. Getting 100k a year in pensions is equivalent to having multiple millions, which very few people will have by the time they retire. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:49 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
The teachers pension works like an annuity. If I die the day after
I retire (or even before I retire), then I leave nothing to my heirs. A person with a 401K, Roth, or conventional IRA leaves potentialy hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Furthermore, I pay 11.5% of my gross salary to my pension. That's
roughly double the SSI contribution.
And I expect about double what I would get from SSI when I retire.
It's only proportional. And remember, I won't get Social Security.
Now I thought this was a real estate message board.
Let's respect our public emloyees. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|