bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

The State of the Nation's Housing 2010
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:04 pm GMT    Post subject: The State of the Nation's Housing 2010 Reply with quote

Did we discuss this report last year? I don't remember. The historical information is interesting but I would like to see an updated report for Boston.

Another neat paper from last year
To Preserve and Protect: Land Use Regluations in Weston.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:19 pm GMT    Post subject: Re: The State of the Nation's Housing 2010 Reply with quote

balor123 wrote:
Did we discuss this report last year? I don't remember. The historical information is interesting but I would like to see an updated report for Boston.

Another neat paper from last year
To Preserve and Protect: Land Use Regluations in Weston.


I know we've discussed that report in the past, though I'm not sure about last year specifically. I definitely remember taking issue with what one of the center's heads, Nicolas Retsinas, has said before. For instance, he said that the Massachusetts housing market would recover in late 2007 or 2008. The bubble era reports from the center were also oblivious and in retrospect probably harmful to anybody who took them seriously. Check out these gems from the 2005 report:
Quote:

in several metropolitan areas where house prices have appreciated the fastest, natural or regulatory-driven supply constraints may have resulted in permanently higher prices.


...and...

Quote:

For now, though, house prices should keep rising as long as job and income growth continue to offset the recent jump in short- term interest rates.

As we know, the housing market crash preceded employment losses and also occurred over a period of declining interest rates.

So not a very good track record there. I seem to remember seeing a list of the center's sponsors at one point and that completely clarified things, but a quick Google search isn't turning that up right now.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:58 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is pretty objective though. I like the history of Weston as it defines the cultural aspect of Boston's housing problems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:30 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

The situation is exactly out of Atlas Shrugged - the producers are leaving the state. The unions are the only ones who'll be left, and then the whole thing will unravel pretty fast. For all the 'jobs' created, Fidelity just took them all out of state - that's over 1000 high paying jobs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:21 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure those jobs were high paying. I think those are in downtown. In any case, they cut a lot more the past few years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:35 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

The point is that Fidelity had 13k jobs in this state a couple of years ago. Now there are only 8k, and you better believe that they are getting together to move out of this state altogether. Compared to some union jobs, these may not be high paying jobs, but compared to the types of jobs available, Fidelity is a pretty high. Now tell me these are not high paying jobs (I just selected the highest number reported, format - average, low, high):

Senior Software Engineer

76 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$75,710
$62k
$87k

Associate Software Engineer Developer

62 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$58,505
$49k
$65k

Financial Services Representative

53 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$39,810
$33k
$51k

Principal Software Engineer

49 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$91,986
$74k
$110k

Software Engineer/Developer

47 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$62,726
$53k
$74k
Looking for a job? See the latest Jobs in Boston

Director

35 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$111,876
$80k
$135k

Associate Systems Analyst

31 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$59,272
$51k
$66k

Senior Business Analyst

28 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$71,164
$55k
$81k

Systems Analyst

24 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$63,567
$57k
$74k

Vice President

21 Fidelity Investments Salaries
$141,576
$90k
$180k
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:30 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll tell you one thing about Fidelity and that's that although it was never a *fun* place to work for, it was a type of job market leader for much of the 90s.

In other words, as salaries augmented throughout the decade, in finance vis-a-vis IT, Fidelity was generally considered the higher paymaster in town and as a result, nearby firms like MFS, Putnam, Scudder, Thompson & Thompson, CTP, & even State St, had to start raising salaries to keep up with them. In essence, the delta between Fidelity and other companies was generally considered a *lifestyle* compensation difference where leaving at at let's say 5-5:30PM was 'ok' with minimal OT, as oppose to always sticking around till 6-7PM. The problem with that was that the younger and coming crowd stayed away from the lower paying shops & gravitated towards Fidelity, as either full employees or contractors. This of course all changed course after the Nasdaq/telecom/IT bust.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:51 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah for the most part those salaries don't impress me. Show me jobs that pay less which aren't hourly. We've already seen that the typical teacher in MA makes $80k - $100k. Waltham has over 100 employees who make over $100k.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:55 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

balor123 wrote:
Yeah for the most part those salaries don't impress me. Show me jobs that pay less which aren't hourly. We've already seen that the typical teacher in MA makes $80k - $100k. Waltham has over 100 employees who make over $100k.


But isn't that a part of the phenomena? I've seen those kinds of salaries, ten years ago. The private sector's generally been wage stagnant whereas teachers & other govt employees have been getting cost of living raises continually, regardless of the private sector economy. So a teacher earning $55K in 1999 is clearly in the $73K+ range today whereas the Fidelity guy, if he's not promoted, is probably working elsewhere if he wants a similar payrate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guest
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:29 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

We went through this last year. The typical teacher in MA does NOT make 80-100K. Do your research.
Back to top
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:08 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Spring is BAAACK the post you are referring to? I think the regulars here know that I do my research so if you're going to make such a claim, be prepared to back it up yourself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:12 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe my statement was a bit generalized. We only discussed unionized teachers in a few districts. The ones I've looked at were Boston, Newton, and Wellesley. I can't speak for other districts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
guest
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:38 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

You said MA.
Back to top
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:18 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

it is true that state employees are the ones making the six figure salaries. This can not go on forever. Its called cannibalism. It can only exist when the economy is doing good. I think that even if teachers were making 50k, they'd still come out ahead due to generous pensions. Getting 40-50k a year from pensions for 30+ years is not a bad deal. If your salary is six figures though, those people will get disproportionate pensions that very few rich millionares can afford. Getting 100k a year in pensions is equivalent to having multiple millions, which very few people will have by the time they retire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guest
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:49 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

The teachers pension works like an annuity. If I die the day after
I retire (or even before I retire), then I leave nothing to my heirs. A person with a 401K, Roth, or conventional IRA leaves potentialy hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Furthermore, I pay 11.5% of my gross salary to my pension. That's
roughly double the SSI contribution.
And I expect about double what I would get from SSI when I retire.
It's only proportional. And remember, I won't get Social Security.

Now I thought this was a real estate message board.
Let's respect our public emloyees.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group