bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

Boston Bubble Brief: The Real Story for MA - Jan 2010
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:52 pm GMT    Post subject: Boston Bubble Brief: The Real Story for MA - Jan 2010 Reply with quote

This is a brief report on what the data for the housing market in Massachusetts looks like in real terms. Market data is typically reported in nominal terms which can be misleading because it combines changes in housing values with changes in the value of the dollar. Correcting for inflation removes changes in the dollar as a factor and gives a more accurate picture of how housing values have changed. This report is based on the published data of the Massachusetts Association of Realtors, though it should be noted that the S&P/Case-Shiller Index is a superior data source.

The Massachusetts Association of Realtors released their data for January 2010 on Tuesday, February 23rd. While the raw prices were provided in nominal terms, for this report they have been adjusted for inflation using the CPI Northeast Urban numbers available at http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ Adjusting for inflation produced the data represented by the graphs below. Prices for January 2003 and earlier have been estimated by applying the earliest reported median from The MAR, February 2003, against the S&P/Case-Shiller Index for the Boston area. Suggestions for improving this estimate are welcome.

Full Price History



Change in Median Price From One Year Earlier, February 2004 - January 2010

Seasonal variations are removed by comparing prices from the same month in the prior year.



Some observations:

  • The real increase from January 2009 to January 2010 was 10.70%.
  • This was the largest year over year increase on record, even exceeding the bubble era increases that are included.
  • This was the second real year over year increase since August 2005, with the first increase being last month.
  • Real prices are still lower than the same month in every year in the time period covered by The MAR, with the exception of 2008.
  • Prices are now 28.75% below the peak set in June 2005. This is the result of a 19.73% decline in nominal housing prices and a 11.23% decline in the purchasing power of the dollar.
  • The cumulative price decline from the beginning (Feb 2003) is 11.58%, which is an annualized decline of 1.76%.


The S&P/Case-Shiller Index for Boston is likely superior to the data above as it corrects for many flaws that are inherent when using only the median price. The S&P/Case-Shiller Index also has the advantage that futures contracts can be traded against it, thereby offering an unbiased insight into where housing prices are expected to be in the future. It also has more extensive historical data available. The MAR data was used for this report mainly out of inertia and might be replaced with the S&P/Case-Shiller Index in future reports.

As usual, please do try this at home. Double checking of the math used to construct the above graphs and analysis is strongly encouraged in order to help ferret out any errors. The data was derived from the following sources:

The text of this post and the associated graphs are Copyright 2010 by bostonbubble.com with all rights reserved, except as stated here. You may reproduce each graph individually or the text of the entire post as a whole (including graphs) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. You may additionally scale the graphs to fit your work. Alternatively, if you remove the bostonbubble.com signature from the bottom left hand corner of the images within this post, those modified images (and only those modified images) can then be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. In all cases, attribution should be made via a hyperlink to http://www.bostonbubble.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2596 or http://www.bostonbubble.com/ Quoting excerpts of the text is also allowed provided that the quotes would normally fall under fair use. To request other terms for reproduction, please post your request in the original thread at http://www.bostonbubble.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2596

The latest version of this report can be found at http://www.bostonbubble.com/latest.php?id=ma_inflation

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JAP
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:29 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

As always, great data and information. The biggest problems I have with stats/information like the one above is people (sellers) see and hear this data and run wild on their asking price for thier homes no matter what price range they are selling in. I would imagine that the 10% increase was mainly driven from lower to lower middle end homes while the higher end homes ($700K+) have seen a drop in value or been stagnet. Obviously this difference would be form the 8K tax credit.

Does anyone know where I can get the data like this broken down by each price segment of the market to determine if that price segment has increased or decreased? I am mainly interested in seeng how home have performed YOY in the 700K+ range. Thanks.
Back to top
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:38 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JAP wrote:
As always, great data and information. The biggest problems I have with stats/information like the one above is people (sellers) see and hear this data and run wild on their asking price for thier homes no matter what price range they are selling in. I would imagine that the 10% increase was mainly driven from lower to lower middle end homes while the higher end homes ($700K+) have seen a drop in value or been stagnet. Obviously this difference would be form the 8K tax credit.

Thanks. What we might be seeing here is an effect of the expansion of the tax credit. It was just expanded to cover high income households (and existing owners). So while the previous incarnation was driving sales on the low end, pushing the median down, the expansion changed that to also drive sales in higher strata too, pushing the median back up. That is my guess, at least. I am surprised that it happened so quickly, though.

JAP wrote:

Does anyone know where I can get the data like this broken down by each price segment of the market to determine if that price segment has increased or decreased? I am mainly interested in seeng how home have performed YOY in the 700K+ range. Thanks.


There is a tiered version of the S&P/Case-Shiller Index which breaks down the market into low, middle, and high tiers.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JAP
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:21 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a link to the Boston Housing Market over 20 years. If you do the rough math it comes out to about an 7.75% increase per year on a 150K investment. Once you take out taxes, maintenance, interest paid on the 150K, cost to eventually sell the house I would image this investment would be well below 5% a year. Not so good compared to the stock market/mutial funds averages over those 30 years from what I remember is about 8%. My takeaway is housing is not a good long term investment like some people claim it to be but it is a safe one genernally speaking. Thoughts?

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqrguz/housingbubble/boston.html
Back to top
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:29 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, this diagnostical tool is telling us something here.

As many have pointed out, we're comparing January to January which means recorded sales of prior agreements that were made a month and a half or so before (mid November).

When you look at it in reflection from period to period, November 08 was a disaster. We had a credit markets meltdown and most people were out of the market to see how the election was going to shake out. Most of the sellers were highly motivated. This current November, you had people motivated to buy to catch the $8k first time buyer stimulus, you had pretty low rates, and more activity on the higher tiered markets.

By having more sales on the higher end it increases the median price. There is a scenario where prices may be declining across the board but, again, because there is more activity on the higher end because the upper middle class are now starting to feel the pinch this diagnostic will show an increase in the median.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:36 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Here is a link to the Boston Housing Market over 20 years. If you do the rough math it comes out to about an 7.75% increase per year on a 150K investment. Once you take out taxes, maintenance, interest paid on the 150K, cost to eventually sell the house I would image this investment would be well below 5% a year. Not so good compared to the stock market/mutial funds averages over those 30 years from what I remember is about 8%. My takeaway is housing is not a good long term investment like some people claim it to be but it is a safe one genernally speaking. Thoughts?


I know 20 years feels like a long time, but I don't think it's anywhere near long enough to draw conclusions. It doesn't even cover the full period for one mortgage (30 years). Professor Shiller's chart of the US market covers a little over 100 years, but even that only covers three non-overlapping periods for what is typical of today's mortgages. To conclude that housing is a "safe" investment over a lifetime, I'd want to see data covering several non-overlapping lifetimes.

Stocks also performed abnormally well over that period due to factors which I feel have been unique and of questionable sustainability, so I don't personally look to them when calculating the opportunity cost of buying a house.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:40 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p wrote:
By having more sales on the higher end it increases the median price. There is a scenario where prices may be declining across the board but, again, because there is more activity on the higher end because the upper middle class are now starting to feel the pinch this diagnostic will show an increase in the median.


That's one of many reasons why the S&P/Case-Shiller Index is better. It isn't directly susceptible to changes in the mix of what is selling since it uses repeat sale pairs.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JAP
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:37 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JAP - your data only look at capital appreciation which is only part of the picture. If the house is primary residence, you need to add rent expense that you would otherwise be paying. If the house is income property, you need to add rental income.
Back to top
CL
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:37 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry somehow I use JAP as username in previous post.
Back to top
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:05 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

This diagnostic is excellent. The fact that you have given us an understanding of what percentages relate to price drops were and what the erosion of the dollar is huge.

This diagnostic isolates and provides a constant for certain important aspects and helps direct us to what the next questions ought to be. I think you are right to always overlay this information with Case Shiller.

I hope the Globe's Kimberly Blanton gives us a nice colored chart showing the sales activity in the different price strata to see if in fact there is a heavier weight on the higher end than in January 08. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:13 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p wrote:

I hope the Globe's Kimberly Blanton gives us a nice colored chart showing the sales activity in the different price strata to see if in fact there is a heavier weight on the higher end than in January 08. Smile


While the January Case-Shiller data doesn't come out until next month, the December data is out now and it looks like it supports my hypothesis above. As you can see from the chart above, there was a large YOY increase in the MA median in December too, but the Case-Shiller Index for Boston only increased 0.47% YOY in nominal terms and it fell 2.30% in real terms. So it does seem like the mix of what is selling has changed. Real prices are actually still falling.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:23 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

What should the headline be?

Median of sales mix weighs towards higher end in market
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:30 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd phrase it along the lines of "Low End Sales No Longer Dominate" since I think that this particular distortion has more to do with the previous tax credit mostly benefiting the low end.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:35 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wait, I screwed that up....

how about:

January YOY Median House Price increases with sales in higher end homes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:36 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like yours better... Have a great weekend...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group