bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

South End, Boston

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
James
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:40 pm GMT    Post subject: South End, Boston Reply with quote

What do you guys think the long term prognosois is for the South End - using your 5-10 yr looking glass.

I really like the area and have been looking seriously and consistently for over a year now. Athough properties like the Bryant went to auction, it seems at least to me that a lot of the nicer brownstone condos are not lingering long on the market. Also, the price/ft has not dropped too much - still in high 5's-700 range as outrageous as that is.

In gerneal the the mantra natiowide seems to be that 'its a great time to buy' but I'm finding it tough. I am frustrated by apartments that still sell quickly at or over asking price despite all the doom and gloom. Is the worst ahead for the South End or is it more resilient? Are there price cuts on the horizon? If only I had that crystal ball.

Anyway, interested in what the Boston area realtors have to say

James
Back to top
bdavis
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:02 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've lived in the South End for over 20 years. I bought a condo here several years ago
because I decided I wanted to live here for a long time.
The non luxury end of the market has been fairly stable here in the SE, BB, abd BH neighborhoods
through this bubble.
But don't count on any real appreciation for the next few (or several) years.
Buy in the SE cuz you love the neighborhood and want to be here indefinitely.
Besides, I look at the traffic on the road at rush hour, and thank goodness I don't have to deal
with it. You pay a lot to live here, but the quality of life of city living is right for some people.
Back to top
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:21 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enjoy while you have city services you can afford. With impending budget disaster in MA, your property taxes will probably go up even as the prices go down. Anybody who's serious in making 5-10 year predictions must be on meth. And 2nd in line to the insane asylum would be a person who actually follows such predictions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bdavis
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:03 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just said don't expect appreciation for the foreseeable future.
I'm not sure if that qualifies as a prediction.

Peace.
Back to top
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:49 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I don't get about the finance industry is that investing is ENTIRELY about making predictions. It is not a guarantee, it is an expectation. If you want someone to pay you money to help them with future earnings I am not sure how one gets away with out setting some sort of expectation. I mean if you're not making predictions or beholding to any level of expectation, your either a critic or a historian; what else is there?

The first definition of "invest"

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/invest

to put (money) to use, by purchase or expenditure, in something offering potential profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value.

I see the modus operandi of many in the finance industry is to belittle those that don't have a deep understanding of their industry and at the same time give themselves an incredibly large margin of error by saying things like "I don't have a crystal ball, I don't predict the future..." In my industry we don't get away with saying, I don't have a crystal ball I don't know if the building is going to leak or fall down or not. This M.O. is off putting to people who engage in managing their own money. I see the benefit of the M.O. as a filter to find the clients that can be easily manipulated and cower to them and at the same time someone who will be too afraid to have any sort of expectation; basically someone who you can rob and abuse. There is a big market by those that want to be told what to do and actually are attracted to someone who makes fun of them. They call them sheep.

Now I understand that the markets are dynamic and fickle, but if everyone can claim Force Majeure for their services and we aren't expected to maintain a certain batting average, we're just amatuers not professionals. I could step up to the plate at Fenway Park and have a batting average of zero. If you can't maintain a batting average you're out.

Theo Epstein the General Manager of the Red Sox is also dealing with wildcards all the time, or how about Bill Belichik who has another team trying to resist him; neither can say "I don't have a crystal ball, I have no way to defend this team or score points against them...". Guys on the Patriots get hurt as well as on other teams, the coach's job is to make adjustments and to make a ton of predictions. I don't see how anyone suceeds without making predictions other than just luck.

In fact, one aspect of the real estate market is in fact the constitution of buyers and sellers. If buyers don't do their homework, the realtors can put a little heat on them and they deform and melt. They are easy prey. What you're seeing now is people doing their homework and realizing that many of the "professionals" are full of shit and their abusive behavior is a mechanism for defense and offense. They're brilliant in that they make money when the market goes up or down, they want you to make a transaction because they get their fees. I think a lot of this "turbulence" is the financial market trying to constantly shake things up because the more turnover, the more fees.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:02 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not so much thinking about you Gen-Xer, I had a realtor belittle me and say I didn't know what I was doing and said that they didn't even want to represent me if I was going to make offers that were more than 6% off of asking. I ended up getting like 16 to 18% off of asking. If I was a wimp and let this person bully me, I would be totally upside down right now living in a place that wasn't nearly as nice. Instead I quantified the risk in my mind by PREDICTING the decline and 3 years later, my place appraised right around the price I bought at.

GenXer, people would be a fool to not listen to you, but by allowing someone to belittle them they lose command presence:

http://www.withthecommand.com/2004-May/PA-Richards-commandpresence.html

When a firefighter leads others into a fire they need others to know that they aren't overwhelmed.

I'm saying in today's market the individuals need their own command presence, otherwise the professionals will abuse them. I think in trying to help someone out, you have to let them find their own confidence because you're not going to be with them all the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:53 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry about that - you could tell I had a nasty high fever when I wrote that....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:57 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

James: I'd worry that the coming 'state bankruptcy' and loss of jobs will push blight into some parts of the city and crime closer to the nicer parts as well. But this amounts to a prediction.

Oh, and I think you may be on the wrong forum. No realtors here (at least I hope). And many of us are renting. Why would you buy when some shmuck can rent his place out to you for 1/2 of what his mortgage is? (or worse).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:40 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

GenXer: I think you're right like 99.5% of the time which is why I want you to be as attractive as possible so people follow your wisdom.

The other thing is, could you be more specific about where you think the taxman's bite will hit worse, the city or the suburbs? I think we're going to be hit with both federal and state taxes, but I'd be nervous about stuff like utility bills or condo fees going up in a city during a period of stagflation.

I think also that people need to understand how the private sector got slammed in 08/09 and how the public sector had a year or so of rainy day funds or stabilization funds that they could burn through so this is the year where they have to face the deep cuts or vote in the tax overrides. Futher, isn't it a Law that taxpayers have to replenish pension funds to certain levels depending on how many participants are in the funds, meaning because Pensions tanked, are taxpayers on the hook for maintaining those levels? Also, the cost of health care for retired government employees is going to be expensive as well.

Do you subscribe to this delayed reaction for the public sector? And if so, how do you think this will play out for renters or owners. I presume renters might get hit up with a little surcharge in their rent if the property taxes go up.

Lastly, what would you do as far as affordability goes (how would you tune these numbers in today's environment):

28% of your gross income on mortgage
3.5 times your salary limit for your house price
10% down payment
6-8 months worth of of expenses for cash reserves
5% house price in some liquid vehicle for unforseeables in home ownership


I am sorry for my overreaction as well, I just get upset when people listen to warm and fuzzy people when they should really be listening to those that see the world for as it really is...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:30 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p wrote:
GenXer: I think you're right like 99.5% of the time which is why I want you to be as attractive as possible so people follow your wisdom.

The other thing is, could you be more specific about where you think the taxman's bite will hit worse, the city or the suburbs? I think we're going to be hit with both federal and state taxes, but I'd be nervous about stuff like utility bills or condo fees going up in a city during a period of stagflation.

I think also that people need to understand how the private sector got slammed in 08/09 and how the public sector had a year or so of rainy day funds or stabilization funds that they could burn through so this is the year where they have to face the deep cuts or vote in the tax overrides. Futher, isn't it a Law that taxpayers have to replenish pension funds to certain levels depending on how many participants are in the funds, meaning because Pensions tanked, are taxpayers on the hook for maintaining those levels? Also, the cost of health care for retired government employees is going to be expensive as well.

Do you subscribe to this delayed reaction for the public sector? And if so, how do you think this will play out for renters or owners. I presume renters might get hit up with a little surcharge in their rent if the property taxes go up.

Lastly, what would you do as far as affordability goes (how would you tune these numbers in today's environment):

28% of your gross income on mortgage
3.5 times your salary limit for your house price
10% down payment
6-8 months worth of of expenses for cash reserves
5% house price in some liquid vehicle for unforseeables in home ownership


I am sorry for my overreaction as well, I just get upset when people listen to warm and fuzzy people when they should really be listening to those that see the world for as it really is...


I guess I haven't lived here during the last time we had 10% unemployment (~1975) so I couldn't tell you how city services are going to be affected.

We know Deval already spent most of the money, and that everybody is hoping that next year everything will be back to normal. If in the next 2 years nothing will be, I think the state will be in trouble.

Actually, I think rents will have to come even further down, so in fact the owners will be at the bigger loss. It all depends how far the job losses will extend.

My suggestion to potential buyers is this - wait 2 years...it won't break you, but at least a number of systemic problems will play out. If we are still in the middle of a recession 2 years down the line, you'd be glad you didn't buy.

I prefer to use risk measures when dealing with purchasing ability. If you and/or your spouse lose your job for an extended period of time, how long will you be able to survive for?

Maximize that number.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bdavis
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:30 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back in 1990 (at the tail end of the 80's real estate bubble and during a recession) the brand new building 75 Clarendon St.
in the SE was completed and marketed. Sales were anemic so the units went to auction. If memory serves me, 2 br units originally
priced at around $179K sold at auction for about $140K. I remember thinking how expensive these prices seemed at the time.
Real estate was flat for about seven or eight years after that. (Those same units probably start in the $500's now).

Anyway, we're probably in for a several year slump just like then.
I see no downside to waiting a while.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group