bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

Why This Depression will be worse than The Great Depression
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
melonrightcoast



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 236
Location: metrowest

PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:52 am GMT    Post subject: Why This Depression will be worse than The Great Depression Reply with quote

I don't know if another blog is "newsworthy", but I found this read very intriguing:

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjune09/depression06-09.html
_________________
melonrightcoast ... are you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:03 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Savings must also be plentiful. If savings are growing rapidly, people will place a lower marginal value on their accumulation; they will be willing to risk some of it against the prospect of a greatly enhanced return.


To take risk, financial planners evaluate not only their client's willingness to take risk but also their ability. With Boston residents, even with 2 incomes, spending 40% income on housing, I've always wondered how any entrepreneurship happens here. You simply cannot afford to take the risk because you can already barely afford not to. What gives?

I think the deal is that for a long time Bostoners were able to get by without ability and just willingness. There was enough credit flowing around that if it didn't work out you could always just borrow more (credit cards, housing, etc). I guess I'm not willing to put myself in a position of food stamps and rotting teeth or success but I also don't see why such a position should be necessary. I suppose some of it also comes from students who have much lower costs of living.

I'm only now starting to appreciate my older coworkers who say things like "I have a family. I need the income". In my head, savings should have eliminated that problem but I didn't understand that with the cost of living there simply isn't room to build those savings that are necessary to allow people to take risk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:15 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's certainly a lot of good observations in this article but it even makes me look like a perma-bull! There is some good in this country and a lot can still be recovered we've just taken a few wrong turns.

In any case, there's plenty of evidence in here for what I've mentioned in other threads: protect yourself against inflation! Speaking of which, I realized the other day that not only are carry trades a good way to protect yourself but they also provide a good source of easily accessible uncorrelated high yield growth! The best part is that you can do it through ETFs, protecting you from income taxes until you are ready to sell!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:40 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like NYT's Paul Krugman has announced the next Depression ...

http://tinyurl.com/2brckw4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:09 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't like him much but I think he has a point about Greece. What I think he misses, though, is that spending during depressions alone doesn't get you out of them. He mentions that you need to keep balanced budgets over the long term. Greece is screwed because during good times they didn't balance their budgets and now they simply have no good choices. He calls for more spending but America is caught in the same trap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:31 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spending more does not get anybody out of being broke. Governments are not an exception. In fact, if we are broke on paper, we are broke, no matter how much money we can print. This is the same thinking that led to this and previous crises - we can just 'repackage' our 'toxic' debt into AAA rated securities and sell it. At some point, treasuries will become toxic, if the current spending spree is not stopped.

Its funny, but Europe has it right for once. Who would have thought that G20 would be lecturing Obama on finances.

There won't be a depression, but a very, very long recession is for sure. Unemployment will probably stay around 10%, and maybe it will jump to maybe 12% or 15%, simply because of all the people who run out of benefits 99 weeks out. But otherwise, this is going to be a new normal from now on until Congress stops spending and starts cutting. It will take a while to clean up our act, but that's the only way to get out of debt.

There is a 'model' planning scenario in the latest Investment News magazine dealing with a family (in their early 50s) that has 2 kids and is making upwards of $285k a year. This family barely has any savings, at least not the kind of savings required to retire given their current consumption and spending levels. Their 2 kids will have their college paid for, at least in part (they can't afford to pay more than $100k per kid). They have a modest $450k house. They need to start taking care of their elderly parents. Everything seems very normal. Except that they only have maybe $500k saved up to now, and no way to save a lot more in the future given their liabilities. A family like that around here would probably not have been able to even afford all of the above, given the housing costs and spending levels. And they are probably top 1% or less as far as earnings go. I can only imagine what everybody else is doing without such incomes, but with houses which are much more expensive. I mean, maybe in 10 years they'll be able to do well, with the kids out of the house (they hope!), but that leaves very little time until their retirement, which by the way, many people would like to happen sooner rather than later (say 62).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
renterstill
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:01 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think that in 15-20 years there will be any social security for the retired?
I live and plan on the assumption that we will get 0 or close to 0 from SS. If we do I count it as an icing on the cake. I'm still hoping that medical care will not be prohibitively expensive for elderly, but it might be substandard at best.
Back to top
mpr



Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:13 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

balor123 wrote:
I don't like him much but I think he has a point about Greece. What I think he misses, though, is that spending during depressions alone doesn't get you out of them. He mentions that you need to keep balanced budgets over the long term. Greece is screwed because during good times they didn't balance their budgets and now they simply have no good choices. He calls for more spending but America is caught in the same trap.


Nope. America has a fiat currency which it controls, so it cannot be in the same trap. The bond market agrees with me BTW, and it agrees with
Krugman too since Greek CDS spreads are now above their previous spike.

One of the unfortunate things about economic discussions is that so many of them are framed in terms of paradigms which are not really that useful - e.g a govt with a fiat currency being "broke", or spending irresponsibly
in the same sense that a family might max out its credit cards.
This is on ample display in this blog, but also in politics and the media.

What Krugman is saying here should be as obvious as the fact that water
flows downhill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mpr



Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:14 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

renterstill wrote:
Do you think that in 15-20 years there will be any social security for the retired?
I live and plan on the assumption that we will get 0 or close to 0 from SS. If we do I count it as an icing on the cake. I'm still hoping that medical care will not be prohibitively expensive for elderly, but it might be substandard at best.


This is too pessimistic. Social security can be fixed by raising the retirement
age a few years. At worst you should plan to retire say at 70 rather than 65.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:29 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpr wrote:

One of the unfortunate things about economic discussions is that so many of them are framed in terms of paradigms which are not really that useful - e.g a govt with a fiat currency being "broke", or spending irresponsibly
in the same sense that a family might max out its credit cards.


The flip side is the fallacy that government spending is anywhere and everywhere justifiable by the greater good. Do it poorly enough and the multiplier can be negative. Government spending can also produce negative externalities, such as misallocation of resources, dependence, and political leverage. It may not be "irresponsible" in the exact same sense as a family maxing out its credit cards, but it can be irresponsible.

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:26 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
One of the unfortunate things about economic discussions is that so many of them are framed in terms of paradigms which are not really that useful - e.g a govt with a fiat currency being "broke", or spending irresponsibly in the same sense that a family might max out its credit cards.


Well, the paradigm is geopolitical. For one... Argentina was in fact like a *family* who'd maxed out its credit cards as its currency wasn't heavily floated on the international forex like the US, UK, or Japan. Thus, when it defaulted, some dozen years ago, it needed to be rescued by the IMF. A family or even a community of families (see Central Valley CA), doesn't have a geopolitical signature like the US govt.

Realize, in addition to the Petrol States, the US dollar is used by countries in Asia to settle accounts for various business transactions. They have more trust in our fiat than Indonesian Rupiahs, Thai Bhat, or even the Taiwanese Dollar because the USA doesn't enforce currency restrictions on the global court. Asian countries mostly practice currency controls. This is part of what keeps America going despite our industries moving abroad in high numbers. It's a type of a clearinghouse for the world of high end finance and business. Since the European Union has failed to create a believable common market/currency of a similar standing, I don't see this role changing for another generation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:38 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lets put this dicussion in historical context so when we go back and read it later we know.

Currently there is a G20 Economic Summit in Toronto. There was a G8 Summit prior to this meeting.

What is going on is that we have the US wanting more Stimulus (priming the pump) or keeping gas in the economic machine to keep it from stalling, and you have the case for Austerity, or creating a miles per gallon standard for government spending to lower deficits and reel in loose credit and lower leverage limits etc.

Obama's policy is basically:

I'll start my diet on Monday.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CC
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:37 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course U.S. dollar is still the world's most trusted currency, but the percentage in the global trade is getting lower almost each year. Country like China doesn't want to hold that much dollars anymore. They are buying gold, resources or exchanging other currencies.

The have learned the lesson, for example they bought junks from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and lost more than three hundred billions. Now U.S. dollar is getting stronger, but it has nothing to do with our economy. It's because there are just too much money in the whole world, and they have to go somewhere safe, just like they flowed to EU last year.

No country or currency stays on top forever. It's not difficult to see signs that the dollar is starting to slide, though I think the bad time will come until at least when we are all retired.
Back to top
CC
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:42 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW, regarding to the article of Paul Krugman, I think US and Europe will become next Japan which has..... 2-3 lost decades? I also think there won't be a depression like 1930, but a very very long recession is still a depression.

Very sad for young kids.....
Back to top
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:20 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not if we can help it. Vote the bums out. Starting in MA. It doesn't matter whom you vote for, as long as they are for cutting spending, taxes and government. We can't spend what we don't have. I'd rather have our standard of living lowered because we are saving rather than because we are overspending.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group