 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BelmontRenter
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:47 pm GMT Post subject: So what have the MLS listings taught us this spring so far? |
|
|
For me, in the towns I follow (Belmont, Newton, Arlington, Winchester) -- not much.
I see mostly listings of 2-families. We rent half of a 2-family right now, and while living this way is not ideal, at the right price it could make sense. But with rents in the below-$2000/month range, buying a 2-family does not make sense. I'm not sure who will buy them . . .
In Newton, I do see a few new listings coming out slightly more aggressive than one might have seen last year, but not by much. This is probably because the inventory in Newton is greater than in other places.
Belmont -- still a dearth of listings below $900K. If spring was going to "pop," it certainly hasn't yet.
I'm starting to think that finding a "bargain" may not happen. Owners are holding on, weathering this out. Unless things get a LOT worse, and the downward slope of the decline increases, prices here may not drop because there are no listings TO drop.
Arlington and Wilmington listings are mostly priced as they were last fall. No signs of aggressive sellers here either.
Do others read this differently? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:51 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
With all the government support lately (lower mortgage rates, FTHB credit), sellers probably are figuring they don't even have to try now. These are just bandaids that will eventually disappear. You'll just have to wait another few years for that correction and I'm guessing government policy will make it as gradual as possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BelmontRenter
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:11 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
With all due respect, while predicting what will happen THIS year is hard enough, now predicting that the "correction" won't happen for "another few years" is pretty much reading tea leaves.
I'm not so sure that "government support" is helping the jumbo market, but I'll be delighted if that's the case. Can you elaborate? Rates certainly are staying flat, if not trending slightly downward these past few weeks.
balor123 wrote: | With all the government support lately (lower mortgage rates, FTHB credit), sellers probably are figuring they don't even have to try now. These are just bandaids that will eventually disappear. You'll just have to wait another few years for that correction and I'm guessing government policy will make it as gradual as possible. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WestCoastXPlant Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:24 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I actually think the FTHC is useless for this market (what's 8K on a 600-700K house?) but the low rates might be helping. From what I was reading it's hard to refi a house that's for sale, so I wonder if what's happening is that folks who were the "need to sell" sellers are instead opting to refi to a low rate/extended term mortgage and sit tight.
I don't know of anything helping the jumbo market, but conforming jumbo limits are still the high ones from 2008, so loans up to mid-500ish should be benefitting nicely from the new govt buyout...It sucks for buyers though because sellers will definitely want to see the effect of this rate...even if it's none they'd have to wait a few months to realize this.
I bet if unemployment rises a good amount things will start changing (IMO unemployment is still fairly low. I mean, the percentage is close to 8% but I think there's a different psychology when you wake up and you can think of at least 2 friends who are out of a job)...whether you're in the mood to buy after that thought is another story  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
balor123
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 1204
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:18 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
If you put 20% down, then a conforming mortgage is a $520k house. Roll over equity from a previous house and you might get to $600 - $700k. Also, you may be able to stack another loan on top? I don't know if that's considered subprime if you still meet income qualifications and provide 20% down. Anyway, it's not surprising that many houses hover around these values. Government support is coming from buying mortgage backed securities and lowering the prime rate. Without it, the interest rates would be at least 6-6.5%. I agree that FTHB credit doesn't help Boston as much as other cities but it provides a trickle up effect. People buy more houses in cheaper communities which allows people in those communities to move up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CC Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:27 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I found the recent asking prices are higher than I expected. Some of the listing prices are really over priced. I think it's because now is the early spring. Sellers are just testing the water and think they still have 6 months to go. There seems no agreement between sellers and buyers now. The market will not move much.
WestCoastXPlant wrote: |
I bet if unemployment rises a good amount things will start changing (IMO unemployment is still fairly low. I mean, the percentage is close to 8% but I think there's a different psychology when you wake up and you can think of at least 2 friends who are out of a job)...whether you're in the mood to buy after that thought is another story  |
I think the unemployment percentage is higher than 8% in MA. More than 2 of my friends are out of jobs or work part-time jobs now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CC Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:31 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, because the trend is still going down. I probably will wait until this fall or next year. It's slow, but you just have to be patient. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenXer
Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 703
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:11 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
As far as prices, I think we basically have the answer in front of us. The unemployment in MA may be closer to 9%, which is still nowhere near where it may potentially be given the possibility that this recession lasts longer than anticipated (though nobody can be sure). However, the unemployment in the 'immune' towns is nowhere near THAT. As we have seen, many of these towns are at full employment, plus or minus (i.e. ~4% or so, which is pretty much full employment). It would seem that the financial hits were distributed throughout, and my hypothesis is that most of those people lived closer to downtown (Brookline, etc) near the T or near the commuter rail. We have seen a relatively limited fallout in the tech sector, and there has been no fallout in the defense sector (full employment, lots of new jobs). Medical layoffs are limited, and it seems that the 'dole-out' may help some poorer towns avoid massive layoffs, though the long term effect is questionable - I think in the end no government efforts will prevent what is going to happen.
The prices have fallen somewhat in Newton near where I rent, and I can see that in the fact that 3 new construction luxury townhouses/houses in my area get no visitors at all, none whatsoever, and the zillow says the price keeps falling (way below the asking price at this point). So, I think this recession will take a very long time to unwind. We also have to consider the possibility that prices will never go down as much in some towns, but I think that if unemployment doubles (to at least 15%) there may be a critical number after which an avalanche of selling may occur, though this is the worst case scenario. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BelmontRenter
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:23 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
GenXer wrote: | We also have to consider the possibility that prices will never go down as much in some towns, but I think that if unemployment doubles (to at least 15%) there may be a critical number after which an avalanche of selling may occur, though this is the worst case scenario. |
I'm beginning to move to this camp -- the one that says prices may not go down much more in the "immune towns" close to Boston.
This is a double-edged sword. On the one edge, things may not get any cheaper/more affordable. On the other edge, buying now at a "decent" price may not be as risky.
I know it's still early spring, and I'll be watching for signs of change. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:29 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
GenXer wrote: | The unemployment in MA may be closer to 9%, which is still nowhere near where it may potentially be given the possibility that this recession lasts longer than anticipated (though nobody can be sure). However, the unemployment in the 'immune' towns is nowhere near THAT. As we have seen, many of these towns are at full employment, plus or minus (i.e. ~4% or so, which is pretty much full employment). |
Is there a source for town by town unemployment stats or is that mainly based on your impression from living in Newton?
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:29 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | For me, in the towns I follow (Belmont, Newton, Arlington, Winchester) -- not much. |
I see the same thing in Cambridge. There are some price reductions but asking prices are still in the $400-$500/sq. ft. range (depending on property), which isn't dramatically different from last year, or from four years ago.
GenXer wrote: | We also have to consider the possibility that prices will never go down as much in some towns, but I think that if unemployment doubles (to at least 15%) there may be a critical number after which an avalanche of selling may occur, though this is the worst case scenario. |
I tend to ignore the "disaster" scenarios simply because I figure that none of us will have jobs if the worst should come to pass, and whether a house in Belmont is $900k or $500k at that point won't really matter very much.
As I see it, prices, as of now, aren't really dropping much in the premium suburban towns.
Quote: | I found the recent asking prices are higher than I expected. Some of the listing prices are really over priced. I think it's because now is the early spring. Sellers are just testing the water and think they still have 6 months to go. |
I've seen posts on this website over the past several years always suggesting that if we just wait 6-9 months, that prices will shake out. The crash is just around the corner, I suppose. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:42 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
JCK wrote: |
I tend to ignore the "disaster" scenarios simply because I figure that none of us will have jobs if the worst should come to pass, and whether a house in Belmont is $900k or $500k at that point won't really matter very much.
|
While that wouldn't immediately make it a better time to buy (unless you pay in cash), I think it would still matter in the sense that if you do buy in at $900K, then you are out $400K in that scenario and less mobile in finding new employment. So I think it's still important to take a stab at assessing the probability of a high unemployment scenario, not because it will necessarily offer an immediately better buying opportunity, but because it affects the consequences of buying now.
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BelmontRenter
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:53 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
admin wrote: |
While that wouldn't immediately make it a better time to buy (unless you pay in cash), I think it would still matter in the sense that if you do buy in at $900K, then you are out $400K in that scenario and less mobile in finding new employment. So I think it's still important to take a stab at assessing the probability of a high unemployment scenario, not because it will necessarily offer an immediately better buying opportunity, but because it affects the consequences of buying now.
- admin |
I agree 100%. The thoughts that go into buying now include one's prediction of future prices (very crystal ballish), and the prediction of one's desire, and ability, to stay gainfully employed within commuting distance of the home for x years. The latter factor is a LITTLE less crystal ballish, but maybe not much, depending on one's profession. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:25 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
admin wrote: | JCK wrote: |
I tend to ignore the "disaster" scenarios simply because I figure that none of us will have jobs if the worst should come to pass, and whether a house in Belmont is $900k or $500k at that point won't really matter very much.
|
While that wouldn't immediately make it a better time to buy (unless you pay in cash), I think it would still matter in the sense that if you do buy in at $900K, then you are out $400K in that scenario and less mobile in finding new employment. So I think it's still important to take a stab at assessing the probability of a high unemployment scenario, not because it will necessarily offer an immediately better buying opportunity, but because it affects the consequences of buying now.
- admin |
That's a good point, but at the same time, when you get to low probability outcomes (of which there are many), things could just as easily go the other way.
The other point is that waiting two years (or whatever) to buy doesn't necessarily reduce the probability of a disaster scenario from occurring.
I'm certainly not trying to make an argument that "now is the time to buy," (and there are plenty of strong non-disaster based reasons to hold off buying right now) but I'm also not certain how to factor such disaster scenarios into one's planning, and to do so in such a way without crippling your ability to make decisions that may benefit you in the far more likely non-disaster scenario.
There's a non-zero chance I get hit by bus tomorrow, for example. Should I not get out of bed? Granted, I'm being a little silly here, but I just don't know how you distinguish between sensible planning for a low probability possible bad scenario, and foregoing your ability to live your life. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenXer
Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 703
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|