 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:33 pm GMT Post subject: What are the new fundamentals? |
|
|
I spoke to someone I know who deals with mortgages and he told me that the norm seems to be a 10% down payment, a 720 plus credit rating, and a good debt to income ratio are where the bar is set.
I wonder if first time buyers are having a lot more trouble forking over 10 percent plus closing costs while still maintaining a decent emergency fund and paying for repairs and for furniture and modest personalization like painting, new floors, window treatments, etc....
The monthly payment component of the "affordability" may be coming around due to lower prices, but the bar being raised to 10 percent down payment might be a new barrier to entry.
One blogger I read said that they were happy that rates were going up because it would lower price significantly which would mean that their down payment would be a greater percentage of principal.
Here's something to think about when it comes to mortgages: jeez, I haven't had a thought like this in a couple months...
Anyway, with respect to mortgages, I see two major components, the cost of capital and the value of the asset (the property). Because the value of the property was taken from the equation because mortgages could be bundled, the lender was less concerned about home prices dropping.
I think this dynamic is soon to change. When the government starts to get a handle on this, they will realize that the lender needs to be on the line in case the borrower defaults because that in of itself creates a more stable market. When these escape routes are closed off and lenders remain on the hook for the underlying asset, you will see lenders correcting the markets by not allowing that much slack.
So I ask you guys, sure cost of capital might go up due to inflation and devaluation of the US Dollar, but what about the inflation/deflation of house prices? If you're the lender are you more afraid that your capital will not be worth as much when the borrower pays you back or if the underlying asset is not worth as much if you end up having to own it? If you’re a borrower and you’re up to your ears in college loan debt, how much are you saving each month and how long will it take to save for a 10 percent down payment, and maintain a decent emergency fund; further, what is the “Boston Premium” worth? If we get inflation, higher rates and price declines, are baby-boomers going to stay in the workforce longer or relocate to a cheaper cost of living area. I think the answers to these questions will form the fundamentals. I wonder what percentage of mortgages are being accepted and if Realtors are up to speed with these new higher hurdles and if they are avoiding situations like closings that don’t happen due to a borrower not getting a mortgage…
What would you add as a new "fundamental" or hurdle? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:27 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | 10% down payment, a 720 plus credit rating, and a good debt to income ratio are where the bar is set. |
with the sale of mortgage assets to entities like fannie mae,
everything else is superflous
though i do think the fears of inflation will force loan rates higher
.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:45 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Check out the spike in rates in the past month:
http://www.bankrate.com/ ...truncated...
This has got to be throwing a monkey wrench into lots of real estate deals made a month ago, and closings scheduled beginning of July...
Check out the past five years, talk about turbulence.
http://www.bankrate.com/ ...truncated...
Editor's Note: This post was edited to abbreviate URLs which were widening the page due to the way that the forum software lays out posts. No other changes have been made, and the URLs still point to the original destinations - only their displays have been shortened. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:54 pm GMT Post subject: Re: What are the new fundamentals? |
|
|
john p wrote: | I spoke to someone I know who deals with mortgages and he told me that the norm seems to be a 10% down payment, a 720 plus credit rating, and a good debt to income ratio are where the bar is set. |
Are these requirements really new or are we just returning to the more cautious criteria that was the norm until the recent bubble years? Even this seems loose - I remember being told growing up that 20% down was standard.
It seems something is still missing, though. Lenders should be looking at cash flow as a fundamental criteria. Maybe that's implicit in what you were told. However, focusing so completely on the credit score to the exclusion of whether the borrower actually has enough income to pay the loan back is what created the subprime crisis (and possibly soon the alt-a crisis).
I read a good explanation of this recently in an email newsletter I'm subscribed to. Hopefully it's OK to share the link (if not, and you're the author, let me know and I'll remove it):
http://mortgagesecretpower.com/Readings/1007/vTWENTYbt.pdf
Off-topic, that newsletter also has an interesting chart on page 20 for timing when to buy property when prices are declining. They claim that waiting for the nominal bottom is the worst move and that there are two points, one before and one after, which would be better. I'm trying to digest this to see if it makes sense. On the surface, I think it makes sense. Buying early gives inflation more time to reduce the real value of your debt. Buying late gives you a cheaper real price. What I'm not sure about is whether their model of inflation is close enough to what I would want.
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:34 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, yes, cash flows were important; I wasn't able to squeeze all of the juice out of the guy unfortunately. I think the 20% down aligns more with a lower price to income ratio than what we're dealing with now. The bar being lifted from 5% to 10% suggests that the industry is looking for a lower price to income ratio. Young buyers might need to wait longer and save, wait and hope that prices nosedive, hope for wage inflation or all of the above.
Very interesting article you posted; give you some insight from the mortgage industry's perspective, harkenings of the automobile industry's policies with safety recalls (weigh the cost of the recall versus the potential costs of liability of not recalling). Also factor in the fact that individuals do play musical chairs, retire, cash out and play the artful dodger when it comes to responsibility.
I went to a manufacturer of a building product and watched a film they used to do "stress tests". They would put their product on this "shake table" to simulate an earthquake. They could model the behavior at different magnitudes. I'm kind of shocked that for very small building components we are required to test these sorts of things, but for real estate, the most common asset, there are no serious industry performance criteria, it is left up to the companies to determine what risk they feel comfortable themselves taking. I guess most of us were naive to think that this industry was run by "grown-ups".
I'm told that mortgages companies are hearing crickets now due to the spike in rates (early June 0 . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|