 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:36 pm GMT Post subject: Who has to sell and who has to buy? What is the ratio? |
|
|
It is clear that the market is stalling; it's like a motorboat that ran out of gas and is being drifted by the wind. Why isn't it sinking more? It's like the market is weak susceptible to a cold, but is still getting up in the morning and getting into work. I think what is missing is the germ. In the 1990's we had serious job losses. People had to sell. Even if someone who bought 10-15 years ago thought they had to sell now, their mortgage might be less than anything they'd downsize to and if they refinanced with rates lower than what you'd get now, they'd be even worse shape to sell now. With unemployment and cash reserves, people can usually weather a typical storm of a 6 month job loss....
Why would someone have to sell other than the folks in the ARMS? Where are those locations? Why wouldn't someone ride out this low tide?
I think what might come into play are four major things:
property taxes:
Older folks might just say to hell with paying these property taxes; I'm out of here.
Opportunity costs:
Developers might take a loss on a real estate investment to take advantage of another more lucrative investment.
People waiting to retire might be enticed by the buying power they have if they move now to Florida seeing that Florida's real estate situation is much worse than ours.
Macro Economics catch up:
We do catch the cold and the day of reckoning comes. All those crazy charts with the spikes in the last four years come down to reality. Some folks decide to be in a better, less risky situation when that day comes.
Meso Economics catch up:
If some towns or neighborhoods are immune to current market conditions in surrounding areas you'll get hot and cold spots. As things tend to drift towards equilibrium, you'll find that people will step back and start to scratch their heads when one town might charge $1 Million for a house where 3 or 4 miles away, that same structure and lot might cost $500k.
I'm curious what people think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:07 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I think you think too much John. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:36 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
You're right. Does anybody know how to create an elipse by slicing a cylinder on an angle?
http://www.wolaver.org/teaching/TAseminar.htm
See Hilbert's diagram about a 1/3 of the way down. What is the formula or the proof to lay it out geometrically? Everything I find about this guy is written in Spanish...
These guys without computers were total mad dogs.
Real estate comes down to the ratio of buyers and sellers and the disposition of them. Meso and macro will come into play.
The meso as I describe will be like this:
http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/SERG/restorationproj/mojave%20desert/deathvalley/fig5.jpg
The cracking is due to some wetter areas than others and the drying out creates diaphram tension (adjacent towns having dissimilar trends, up and down). The tension rips the fabric like these cracks.
The bubble (amount of buyers attending open houses in Norwell) might be larger than those buyers going to Pembroke in prior years. The towns with the lower buyer to seller ratios see more price drops due to the negotiation power of the buyers. Other buyers that are competing with themselves in other towns might wake up to notice that there are other ponds that nobody else is fishing in.
The other thing is that even if the power is in the hands of the buyers, if buyers never show up to take advantage, the statistics won't ever be recorded because the sales never happened.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:24 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.amazon.com/Mathematics-Physicists-Dover-Books/dp/0486691934
This book is amazing. I don't fully understand most of it yet, but it gives you the building blocks for understanding the order of how things happen in nature.
I guess when you study numbers in a static mindset you're just an observer. When you can see dynamics in numbers you can project and predict action.
Everything goes back to that Periodic Table.
In Business School they talked about Marketing. From what I gathered it was about creating an electric field to create excitement and induce the behavior of buying. It was about putting someone in a state of mind to buy. Shiller talks about irrational exhuberance right... That sure sounds like the perfect electric field needed to create that type of activity necessary to create a bubble.
People are sober now, the beer goggles are off.
I also think it is a good thing to think. Conventional wisdom is gold, but I think it is also good to benchmark against everything you can. It's kind of like getting a warning for a tsumani that could come out of nowhere. Conventional wisdom does in fact have a warning for that even: some guy found out that there is usually a spike in missing pets before an event like that. If you can get a sense of the tell signs you'll better understand those risks.
What is very disheartening for this generation is that those that played by the rules have fallen behind and those that rolled the dice seemed to catch a big wave. If this generation does need to deal with risk (the age of turbulence according to Greenspan) I really recommend understanding the art and dynamics of exhuberance and the potential of a slow market. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spork
Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:58 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I noticed this blog a few months back and have been reading it periodically, so if some points are redunant based on previously covered ground, I appologize.
I don't think you are going to see the market sink here in MA. MA is not positioned like CA and FL etc with the higher number of subprime loans and overbuilding?(overbuilding is my speculation). The economy is okay here.
That being said, I do think you are going to start to see the mkt "correction" really materialize and pick up very significant momentum this winter in MA.
obviously many issues are at play, here are my main points
Reasons:
increased national and local coverage of thehousing slump-last weeks national coverage (speculation that mkt will be down thourgh '09), this weeks local sept data- don't underestimate water-cooler talk
not until recently has the MAR and warren report data discrepancy really been publicized-MAR does not include the bottom portion of the bell curve skewing the data. no foclosures and FSBOs which tend to be
with all that being said, realtor mkt spin just doesn't work as well as it use to
data like the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index for the boston metro lags beind almost 2 months...this has been up slightly over the summer-I would say it has been roughly flat. But in this down mkt, that is what you would expect...flat during the traditional "hot" selling/buying months, and down in the "cold" months. conversely, in an up mkt, it has shown to be relativley flat in the winter and really climbs spring through fall. this number will begin to decline again... more bad news for the mkt- i guess we will see how august was in a week
and the final reason as suggested by john p in part,"meso economics" ...desirable locations are still stable...but not for long. The wave in skyrocketing housing prices that splashed over worcester a town or 2 west is receding east...and no town is immune or "insulated" for long. these will decline eventually... By desirable i mean nice town, less commute 2 work for most in many cases...each adjacent town will put downward pressure on the next moving eastward over this winter. people who work inside the 495 belt will not have to settle as much....
note WBJ today: worcester county sept sales down 46% compared to 06! Now why isn't that big news...or at least highlighted int he warren group press release.
(also population change 2000/2005 worcester metro +5% boston metro +1% resectively if i remember correctly....now why is that??? mmm....could it be people settling west due to home prices?)
main reason why it won't sink/plummet: thread topic
most sellers do not have to sell
inventories not significantly rising
my best guess: bottom out march '09 around low 150s on the S&P/CS index be flat for a year or two-high in summer -maybe visit mid/low 150's again a subsequent winter or two b4 it trends up
duration (inflation, time value of money) accounting for half of the correction
just started typing away, not sure if this was very cohesive, any thoughts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:08 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Think about it if you're a mortgage company in a suffering industry right now. A huge amount of loans are slated to reset in early 2008 right? If the market tanks and tons and tons of people foreclose, do you think that that is a good thing for the mortgage industry? Barney Frank is trying to push through legislation to put them on the hook for stuff they never were. Don't you think that the banking and mortgage folks want to plug a hole into this before it blows open? I mean think of it this way, companies don't hire people to lay them off. It is expensive for the mortgage industry to go through what might happen.
As far as buzz is concerned, Septembers numbers have a lot to do with the interest spike in the past few months. Interest has come down a lot in the past month. Like this guy is saying, if you take this bad buzz into the slow season, it could be a cold winter. Mortgage and banking companies might be afraid of being too upside down if the market really corrects.
Second about buzz, buzz cost money. Casinos pay for research, and I'd guess most of those studies that are being cited were paid for indirectly by the casino industry or those that favor casinos. Fair and honest research is not paid for for anti-casino folks; people need to rely on common sense. The market bubble was fueled by a buzz paid for by the realtors and the mortgage industry. You had a lot of people being paid to pump up the bubble and now keep it inflated.
I mean you can study the numbers, but trying to be in tune with people's perceptions is also important because if the market doesn't make sense it doesn't matter, it is the reality you live in. I am mentally trying to get around any thing that might contribute to those spikes other than the interest rate drop. For instance, the way inflation is determined may have changed and in turn changed the nature of the readings... I know this doesn't close the gap much, but I want to know these details. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigRock
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:45 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
The ratio is simple.
The percent of people that have to buy : 0%
The percent of people that have to sell : infinitely larger
Noone HAS to buy a house, the entire society could rent.
But as for people who have to sell, if there is a job loss, medical problems, etc then yes they HAVE to sell i they can't pay their mortgage or taxes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BK- Former Owner Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:51 pm GMT Post subject: Credit Bubble |
|
|
Everyone is missing the popint of what drove this Real Estate - IT WAS A CREDIT BUBBLE! We are still in midst of the Credit Bubble being deflated and its sure to be a painful process.
With easy Credit out of the Market you will see the cost/price of homes drop. Most families that are just starting out have a very hard time raising a down payment of greater than $50,000. The added wrinkle is that the USA could continue on this Inflation trend. ITs even more difficult to save when taxes, food, and gas are climbing at a rate of 4-6 % per year.
This will create great buying opportunities with those who:
1. Sat on the Sidelines of the Housing Bubble
2. Have invested their nest egg in things that increase in value during Inflationary economic policies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:59 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Why would someone have to sell other than the folks in the ARMS?
|
Here are a few more reasons:
- Change in family situation (e.g., birth, death, divorce)
- Change in job situation (e.g., layoff, transfer, retirement)
- Wish to flee forthcoming casinos
Quote: |
It is clear that the market is stalling; it's like a motorboat that ran out of gas and is being drifted by the wind. Why isn't it sinking more?
...
The other thing is that even if the power is in the hands of the buyers, if buyers never show up to take advantage, the statistics won't ever be recorded because the sales never happened....
|
I think part of the problem is that the people who are supposed to be working on behalf of the buyers, the buyers' brokers, are actively discouraging prospective buyers from making low-ball offers. Check out this Globe blog entry, which is incidentally by the same broker who gave you that weak "it depends" answer when you asked her about asking versus selling price:
http://www.boston.com/realestate/news/blogs/renow/2007/10/when_is_a_lowba.html
First, she defines low-balling as "when a buyer makes an offer more than $5-10,000 below what the property is worth." I'm sorry, that just astounds me. On a $500K home, a $5K discount would be a measly 1%. Calling that a low-ball strikes me as ridiculous. (Incidentally, she goes on to equate what a house is worth with comps that have been sold recently, so this isn't a $5K discount that follows some larger discount that would correct for the bubble.)
Then, in the comments, somebody asked her:
Quote: |
Rona, if I were to say to you that I am only interested in making offers of at least 15% below what is supposedly market value (since that is where the futures market says Boston prices will be in 2010), would you tell me to find a different buyer's agent? I could care less if sellers aren't thinking in percentages or if this won't work with most sellers - I only need it to work with one. Would buyer's agents (and you in particular) tell me to take a hike if I wanted to try this?
|
To which she replied:
Quote: |
My clients are interested in buying a property that suits them for as little money as possible. I can only work with about five households at a time. So I work with people who have a logical plan. Your plan to buy at 15% below market value is unrealistic. You are unlikely to succeed; I would not allow you to hire me if that is your buying plan.
|
So to address your point about buyers not showing up to take advantage of the current atmosphere, I think that this is at least in part due to the unwillingness of the other parties involved to budge on price, even those parties who are supposed to be working on behalf of the buyer. You said that you had a similar experience with your first buyer's agent when you bought. I could definitely see this turning off a lot of potential buyers (it turns me off).
So let's get the ball rolling. John P, your second buyer's agent was apparently more amenable to the low-ball approach. Would you recommend him/her? If so, post his/her name/email/website/whatever as a recommendation in the thread on buyer's agents. Anybody else who has used a low-ball friendly agent who they wish to recommend, please post as well.
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eti Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:20 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
You know what I wonder, with MA's job market and now with the mandatory health insurance soon people will not be able to buy food let alone a $500K house. Look at the statistics, how many people in MA or in entire US make over $150K/year so that they can buy a $500K house. Noone is looking at the reality. There is a game everyone is playing, and noone seems to open their eyes and look around. I do not understand how we can even think about the future of housing market when a median home is $300K and median income is $50K. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:37 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Admin,
I wonder if you and she aren't talking about two different things. In the quotes you've pulled, she says "don't bother making an offer more than a few percent below what the home is worth." From your comments, I deduce that you're talking about the about the seller's asking price, which may be well above what the property is worth.
Just my two cents. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:48 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
JCK wrote: | Admin,
I wonder if you and she aren't talking about two different things. In the quotes you've pulled, she says "don't bother making an offer more than a few percent below what the home is worth." From your comments, I deduce that you're talking about the about the seller's asking price, which may be well above what the property is worth.
Just my two cents. |
JCK,
I know she added that caveat, which is why I mentioned that she indicated that she determines what a home is worth based on recent comps. What I was saying was that calling an offer ~1% below recent comps a "low-ball" is ridiculous, irrespective of how that relates to the asking price. I agree with her that the asking price should be ignored, for the most part.
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:31 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
admin wrote: | JCK wrote: | Admin,
I wonder if you and she aren't talking about two different things. In the quotes you've pulled, she says "don't bother making an offer more than a few percent below what the home is worth." From your comments, I deduce that you're talking about the about the seller's asking price, which may be well above what the property is worth.
Just my two cents. |
JCK,
I know she added that caveat, which is why I mentioned that she indicated that she determines what a home is worth based on recent comps. What I was saying was that calling an offer ~1% below recent comps a "low-ball" is ridiculous, irrespective of how that relates to the asking price. I agree with her that the asking price should be ignored, for the most part.
- admin |
If the guy across the street from the seller just sold his (comparable) place for $450k, would you reasonably expect the seller to accept $400k? The buyer may be objectively correct that the house is worth $400k, but I bet you'll have a tough time getting your offer accepted.
I think that's what she's getting at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|