 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:59 pm GMT Post subject: 2007 Real Estate Property Taxes |
|
|
The wife and I got our new tax bill this year. Apparently, for some reason, the 2007 tax year is based on the 2005 evaluation and the assessment is like $35,000 more than I bought it for this time in 2006.
Not only is this bogus, but my mortgage company contacts us and asks us to add to our escrow account and even though it was our first notification, they wanted to charge us like $250 for a "late charge" in addition to the $200 per month premium for the escrow account. It was another one of those dirt bags that you get at a call center in India. I am hearing time and time again that the people at the call centers in India are awful, sleazy, off the hook terrible. The person finally backed off the "late charge" and then when my wife said she would pay it over the phone; he wanted to charge her $20. These people are not going to help the US / India relations that are for sure, what type of people are these folks and I hope they don’t represent their society? You know some nice old lady most likely paid this outrageous fee.
From buying a house, getting financing, the whole nine, and now with the real estate taxes and the finance company it has been a complete Keystone Cops comedy of errors with these awful complete hacks in this industry. I am getting weary having to deal with complete nonsense and sleaze every step of the way.
Anyway, if property taxes are as high all around because for whatever reason, they are based on 2005 evaluations, it just ate a bit more into affordability and I'm reading that salaries were stagnant over the past year. If you’re thinking about buying, get the current real estate tax situation for the property. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:14 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Man, that's awful. I'm sorry to hear it. Can you appeal the assessment?
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:17 pm GMT Post subject: Re: 2007 Real Estate Property Taxes |
|
|
john p wrote: | The wife and I got our new tax bill this year. Apparently, for some reason, the 2007 tax year is based on the 2005 evaluation and the assessment is like $35,000 more than I bought it for this time in 2006.
Not only is this bogus, but my mortgage company contacts us and asks us to add to our escrow account and even though it was our first notification, they wanted to charge us like $250 for a "late charge" in addition to the $200 per month premium for the escrow account. It was another one of those dirt bags that you get at a call center in India. I am hearing time and time again that the people at the call centers in India are awful, sleazy, off the hook terrible. The person finally backed off the "late charge" and then when my wife said she would pay it over the phone; he wanted to charge her $20. These people are not going to help the US / India relations that are for sure, what type of people are these folks and I hope they don’t represent their society? You know some nice old lady most likely paid this outrageous fee.
From buying a house, getting financing, the whole nine, and now with the real estate taxes and the finance company it has been a complete Keystone Cops comedy of errors with these awful complete hacks in this industry. I am getting weary having to deal with complete nonsense and sleaze every step of the way.
Anyway, if property taxes are as high all around because for whatever reason, they are based on 2005 evaluations, it just ate a bit more into affordability and I'm reading that salaries were stagnant over the past year. If you’re thinking about buying, get the current real estate tax situation for the property. |
That's terrible. I'm pretty sure it's the mortgage company's responsibility to maintain the balance in the escrow and to estimate the payment. My escrow balance has gone negative, but I don't believe I've been penalized for that, because I don't set the minimum payment. When I got my mortgage, I glanced through laws/rules regarding escrow accounts, and I'm fairly sure that they shouldn't be charging you any fees for their inability to accurately estimate your taxes.
If your assessment is wrong, I would do as admin suggests and challenge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:18 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I will show you two houses that sold in this (a small town) within two weeks of each other
My house bought Sept. 1, 2006:
paid $543k
current assessment- $577k
current assessment- 106% of what I paid
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=57182998
Another house, same town, sold August 17, 2006 (less than 2 weeks prior to my sale)
paid $295k
current assessment $253k
current assessment- 85% of market value
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=57182470
I am paying 21% more in property taxes based on fair market value.
When I spoke to the town assessor she seemed very, very prepared and on top of things, so I don't know if this is an anomaly in the market behavior and price structure in the past few years or her metrics don't align with the reality. I mean when we bought the house it was assessed at $510 and we paid $543k (including stuff like washer, dryer, refrig, window treatments, electric dog fence, etc.) For it to go from $510 to $577 in one year sounds sketchy. My wife and I have the money to cover it, and we don't have a variable rate, but if this is something that others will face on top of the variable rate it might be enough to overheat the situation and lose their financial stablity. Now think about all those financial folks that got fat last winter with their Christmas Bonuses. I wonder what Christ would have thought about their selfishness and how his name got attached to that sort of reward.
I should have some of you cats over for a bender one weekend. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JCK
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 559
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:56 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
I assume your town only does assessment every two years? Otherwise it's very odd that 2005 and 2006 are the same, and a huge jump for 2007.
$510k-$575k is a $65k jump which is about 13% of the lower estimate. If this represents two years of change from 2003-2005, that doesn't sound unreasonable (about 6% per year for those two years).
Haven't looked at the other home you're comparing to, but it is in a difference price class... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:45 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Running the numbers for affordability based on real estate taxes:
http://www.dor.state.ma.us/apps/TaxRates/taxrate.pdf
Based on the tax rate, if a house costs $500k in Halifax which has a tax rate of 11.78 per thousand, that would yield the same mortgage payment as a $513.5k house in Lynnfield. Essentially, the cheaper tax rate gives you $13,500 more to spend to reach the same mortgage payment.
Don't forget to think about this.
Also, ask each Town Administrator what the bond rating is and if a detailed 5 Year Capital Plan is available for your review. If you get a deer-in-the-headlights look you should put an asterisk next to this town. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:59 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Hell, I shouldn't have chosen Lynnfield, but rather Halifax's neighbor Hanson.
Halifax- 11.78
Hanson- 9.38
Neighboring towns, both with commuter rail stops (Hanson being closer)
Based on just the tax rate, you could afford $14,500 more in Hanson to get the same mortgage payment.
Add the surcharge of the commuter rail (Zone 6 Hanson versus Zone 7 Halifax) $223 per month versus $235 per month and you have an extra 12 bucks a month. That adds up.
http://www.mbta.com/fares_and_passes/rail/
Add that surcharge to the discount for the cheaper tax rate and you can spend $16,000 more dollars on a house in Hanson than you can in Halifax (neighboring towns) to get the same mortgage rate.
Sometimes the little things add up... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:59 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
mortgage payment... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hyperbad
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:11 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
john p wrote: |
I should have some of you cats over for a bender one weekend. |
Dude I am *sooooo* there!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:23 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Let's do it baby!!!
She likes to drink Old Grand Dad and her shoes all shuffle around doot dew doo... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john p
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1820
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|