 |
bostonbubble.com Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
|
SPONSORED LINKS
Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com
YOUR AD HERE
|
|
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the
associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed
or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information
provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed.
As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against
multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed
belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
news
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 0 Location: Greater Boston
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FreedomCM Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:36 pm GMT Post subject: What's next? |
|
|
These are good questions. Does anyone know what are the answers for MA? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 1826 Location: Greater Boston
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:48 pm GMT Post subject: Re: What's next? |
|
|
FreedomCM wrote: |
These are good questions. Does anyone know what are the answers for MA? |
I vaguely recall reading, though am by no means certain, that title insurance is very difficult to get for foreclosures, which might explain the second question. As for why the banks which sold the foreclosures aren't on the hook... that is an excellent question that I'd like to know too. Perhaps they will ultimately be on the hook and this was just the first prerequisite to arriving at that. Perhaps this is also complicated by many of the original lenders being out of business now. If the original mortgage was sliced, diced, and resold improperly (e.g., if MERS is ruled invalid), the mortgage holder who foreclosed may have come into possession of the mortgage improperly and the original lender may no longer exist. Who's on the hook then?
- admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FreedomCM Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:12 am GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Astute Observation by Honcho
2011-10-19 06:25 PM
Thanks for the link. It is fairly complex reasoning but not a major issue for actually innocent buyers (bona fide purchasers).
The court found here that the buyer was not an innocent purchaser because the chain of title was clear that the “bank” didn’t have record title at the time of the purchase. It was subsequent to the purchase that the bank recorded the confirmatory deed showing a transfer of title to the “bank” was filed in the public record. Had the confirmatory assignment been filed in the public record prior to the purchase, this guy wins his case (even if the bank had no authority to foreclose at the outset).
I want to dig into it a little more before really saying whether it is a good or bad decision or what the lasting effects would be on the title insurance or foreclosure purchaser industry.
It’s still a little shocking that the bank found it equitable to take property away from a person who paid real value at a foreclosure sale and gave the property back to a person who had not made their mortgage payments. There may be more going on here than what is in the decision…. |
from a RE lawyer who defends the banks in CA from MERS related lawsuits, posted at:
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/blog/comments/payment-affordability-in-irvine-hits-an-11-year-high/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JacobS
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:42 pm GMT Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, I was about to looking to look into cheap land for sale , but after seeing this...I guess I'll wait for better times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|