bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

Negative equity borrowers in MA average $120K underwater

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> News & Reference Suggestions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
news



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:50 pm GMT    Post subject: Negative equity borrowers in MA average $120K underwater Reply with quote

Use this forum thread to discuss the following link.

Description: Negative equity borrowers in MA average $120K underwater
URL: http://www.housingwire.com/2011/06/07/40-of-underwater-borrowers-hold-home-equit ...truncated...
Info/Broken?: http://www.bostonbubble.com/link_info.php?id=3547

Subscribe to New Links: RSS Feed
Suggest a Link: New Topic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Renting in Mass



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 381
Location: In a house I bought in December 2011

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:17 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ouch! And walking away isn't an option in Mass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:54 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ouch indeed.

$120k average? That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes.

I wonder what the distribution looks like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:47 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JCK wrote:
$120k average? That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes.


If this includes HELOCs, then it makes sense. People lived beyond their means, but then, lost the cushion of rising prices.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:07 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

What did the gains look like during the bubble years?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CL
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:39 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Press release and some more data from Core Logic

http://www.corelogic.com/uploadedFiles/Pages/About_Us/ResearchTrends/CoreLogic_Q1_2011_Negative_Equity.pdf

If you scale the $120K with the property value, that will be a better gauge.
Back to top
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:19 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boston ITer wrote:
JCK wrote:
$120k average? That almost does not seem believable, unless most underwater folks have extremely expensive homes.


If this includes HELOCs, then it makes sense. People lived beyond their means, but then, lost the cushion of rising prices.


I'm still not buying it. I'm sure there are folks who are $120k underwater, but it seems pretty hard to do, unless you're in a $800k+ home and your value has absolutely tanked.

Let's assume you HELOC'd yourself to 100% LTV at the peak. I'm going to through two test cases here: High value and low value:

Home worth $600k at peak. The nominal decline for the high tier in Boston from peak is about 10%, per Case-Shiller. So that home would be worth $540k today. That doesn't get you to $120k debt.

Home worth $300k at peak. This might be middle tier, but let's assume it's in the low tier, because that has shown a bigger decline. That home has declined ~30% from peak. You're still only in the hole by $90k.

Thus, it's tough to even come up with scenarios where you can be in the hole by $120k, unless you bought a very expensive home that tanked. I just can't see how that could possibly the average...

http://blog.redfin.com/boston/2011/04/case-shiller_boston_home_prices_inch_toward_a_post-peak_low.

I think there's something screwy going on with those numbers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> News & Reference Suggestions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group