bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

Mass. Senate approves sales-tax increase
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 3:04 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to have seen more banks than just Lehman Brothers fail. At the very least they shouldn't be profiting from this. Sure the economy would be a wreck for 1-2 years but we'd recover.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 3:16 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure that's true; look at Japan and the Great Depression as to examples of what happens when the government let's 'em fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 5:01 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So what's the realistic alternative? Let 'em fail? That worked wonders with Lehman Brothers...


Yes. If you don't let people fail, they never learn.

Quote:
And what would've McCain done to get the deficit under control? More tax cuts for the wealthy?


Socialism doesn't work. Wealthy pay all the taxes, hence tax cuts are for them. If you make >100k, you pay all of the taxes. For those who don't have any taxes, you can NOT have any tax cuts. Capitalism is about incentive, socialism is about entitlement. Which one would you think is going to make a country rich? You can't start with socialism, because then nobody would want to work.

Unions are the problem. They've outlived their usefulness. You can't get something for nothing, and you can't get paid many times what a non-union employee would cost. Its unsustainable, and this kind of reality can only be supported by stealing money from the taxpayers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 5:32 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JCK, I see you as a realist, and it can seem cavalier to just say let them sit in the mess that they've created. If we made people sit in their own self created hardships then we'd be up to our ears in yogurt, I see your point. I also agree with Gen X-er because although you don't want all that yogurt to surface, you're just building more and more of it out of sight and further down the road.

I think the way to stop the hemmorage is to first admit we have a problem and then to build the values necessary to curb the bad behavior. I have alway thought that things that a society was good at were things they valued and things they stunk at were things they didn't pay enough attention to. Massachusetts is great as far as sports because we value sports and we're bad about paying the tab for our spending because we don't value fiscal responsiblity.

I think a spending bill may have been necessary, but there were too many earmarks. McCain said that he wanted to make a law that every representative had to attach their name to every earmark so that they would be accountable for the pork they requested. Obama didn't call wasteful spending "pork", he called it "Investment". In the Reinvestment and Recovery Act, we were paying for a frisbee golf course. If McCain was in charge, we'd know the name of the irresponsible a-hole that put that one in. Further, Candidate Obama said he wouldn't allow earmarks and then voted for a bill that had something like 8,000 earmarks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 6:01 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p wrote:
JCK, I see you as a realist, and it can seem cavalier to just say let them sit in the mess that they've created. If we made people sit in their own self created hardships then we'd be up to our ears in yogurt, I see your point. I also agree with Gen X-er because although you don't want all that yogurt to surface, you're just building more and more of it out of sight and further down the road.

I think the way to stop the hemmorage is to first admit we have a problem and then to build the values necessary to curb the bad behavior. I have alway thought that things that a society was good at were things they valued and things they stunk at were things they didn't pay enough attention to. Massachusetts is great as far as sports because we value sports and we're bad about paying the tab for our spending because we don't value fiscal responsiblity.

I think a spending bill may have been necessary, but there were too many earmarks. McCain said that he wanted to make a law that every representative had to attach their name to every earmark so that they would be accountable for the pork they requested. Obama didn't call wasteful spending "pork", he called it "Investment". In the Reinvestment and Recovery Act, we were paying for a frisbee golf course. If McCain was in charge, we'd know the name of the irresponsible a-hole that put that one in. Further, Candidate Obama said he wouldn't allow earmarks and then voted for a bill that had something like 8,000 earmarks....


john,

I think getting rid of the earmarks is a good idea. I don't think, however, the amounts are going to get us out of debt. They are some tiny fraction of total expenditures.

I also can't blame Obama for voting on bills with earmarks. I assume every bill has them.

Problem is that people want low taxes but want the services. So we (MA, US) vote for people who promise just that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CC
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 9:13 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JCK wrote:
I'm not sure that's true; look at Japan and the Great Depression as to examples of what happens when the government let's 'em fail.


Actually Japan government spent tons of money on banks during the lost decade, just like what we are doing now.

===========
BTW, FDIC will borrow 500 billions from the treasury. Somehow not many people noticed this news just few days ago. I don't think this is a good sign. I guess more banks will fail very soon (I guess something like 50-100).
Back to top
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 9:16 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobody ever promised lower taxes in MA. People who want them do either one of two things:

1) Vote with their feet
2) Hopelessly try to vote for lower taxes (and get ignored and outvoted)

The result is the same. Unions and big government hacks and beneficiaries keep voting for Kennedys and Kerrys. Corruption is unbelievable. The hacks who get elected promise handouts and entitlements. This is why they are voted in, and this is why Obama was voted in. Nobody in their right mind would vote for a socialist, whose goal is to subsidize his supporters and voters through wealth redistribution.

Just like for a Corporation, there is a balance sheet. No use pretending there isn't. And someday, we'll have to pay. They day will come in MA, just like it is imminent in CA. Look at Democratic vs. Republican states. Look at Texas vs. New York, CA, MA and NJ. Look where the growth is, and where the socialism basically destroyed any growth with taxes. People are not dumb. There is no incentive to hire or expand because taxes and expenses are so huge that its not worth it. Also, don't forget regulations (don't get me started on that one).

Intentions don't count. Deeds do. And we know what socialism leads to - poverty and dictatorships as well as total loss of freedom, one law at a time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 2:19 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

JCK wrote:
I'm not sure that's true; look at Japan and the Great Depression as to examples of what happens when the government let's 'em fail.


As CC points out Japan, is a great example of what happens when you go our route. A better example would be the Great Depression. Some economists argue that it would have ended in 2-3 years if it weren't for all the entitlement spending. I think the best approach is to let the markets choose their directions and provide support to accelerate the process and change the rules so that it can't happen again. What Bush and Obama are doing is perpetuating the same broken process due to demosclerosis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nickbp



Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:10 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p wrote:
If you don't believe me, look at this chart. Look at how the home ownership rate skyrocketted when Bill Clinton came into office.

http://www.affordablehousinginstitute.org/blogs/us/us_homeownership_rates_small.jpg


What's the connection between Clinton and that graph?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nickbp



Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:13 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

GenXer wrote:
Deeds do. And we know what socialism leads to

You assert that Obama is a socialist, which of his deeds show this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 11:55 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

nickbp: How about the biggest wasteful spending ever (this is what Socialist countries do)? Bailout of the car company unions (returning the favors)? Closure of the Guantanamo and demoralization of CIA? Defense department cuts? Raising taxes on the most productive taxpayers (wealth redistribution, pure and simple)? Well, in 4 months he accomplished a lot. I just don't know if we'll be able to afford another term of this guy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Renting in Mass



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 381
Location: In a house I bought in December 2011

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:12 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

GenXer wrote:
Closure of the Guantanamo and demoralization of CIA?


Huh? I think you need to recalibrate your definition of socialism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:35 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Part of the same script. Blame USA for all of the world's evils. Blame capitalism for all the world's evils. I don't think you will want to live in a socialist country where health care is socialized and where your salary and benefits are mandated by some higher authority. I don't see too many people from USA moving to Sweden and Norway, but I see plenty of immigrants wanting to come to USA. It used to be that they came to make themselves a new life using the opportunities available here. Now, we mostly have people come here to get a handout - in-state tuition, hospital care, public schools and everything else that comes for free if you are an illegal alien. Of course, this is not Obama's doing, but he will be happy to perpetuate and expand this, and given his voting record in the Senate, he supported everything along these lines, making him probably the most socialist Senator in the Senate. By himself and in 4 months he didn't do a heck of a lot (yet), but we are already on the slippery slope towards socialism. I think I made up my mind that he's a socialist when he openly mentioned redistribution of wealth, just like that, as if its common sense that you can steal from the most productive taxpayers to pay for his own voters' social programs. This is what Chavez does in Venezuela, but its not the American way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nickbp



Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 4:17 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

GenXer wrote:
nickbp: How about the biggest wasteful spending ever (this is what Socialist countries do)?

You mean spending the money that Paulson got? Or are you referring to the stimulus money that's keeping us out of a depression? How does that compare to Bush's tax handouts to the rich, or Bush's expenditures and handouts in Iraq? Is Bush also a "socialist"?

Quote:
Bailout of the car company unions (returning the favors)?

How is this different from foreign car companies getting tax incentives in their respective states?

Quote:
Closure of the Guantanamo

What's "socialist" about this?

Quote:
demoralization of CIA?

Oh boo hoo, poor CIA is getting in trouble for breaking the law, we don't want to offend their sensibilities, or else they'll turn into a bunch of teenagers and have a hissy fit.

Quote:
Defense department cuts?

I wasn't aware that cutting unnecessary government expenditures counted as "socialist" these days.

Quote:
Raising taxes on the most productive taxpayers (wealth redistribution, pure and simple)?

Which would bring us back to upper tax brackets that are still far below historic levels. Turns out we were "socialists" throughout the 20th century?

GenXer wrote:
I don't think you will want to live in a socialist country where health care is socialized

I'd like to live in a country where health care works, where getting fired isn't the 1-2 punch of no salary and no coverage. If every other industrialized nation has developed a better system for health care, there's absolutely no reason that we as Americans shouldn't adopt that system. No amount of "socialist" namecalling will solve the problems of our health care system.

Quote:
where your salary and benefits are mandated by some higher authority.

Given that the US is currently a majority shareholder in AIG, I think they should have some say in what benefits are given out to AIG employees. (Personally, I think AIG should've been sold off in pieces FDIC-style, but there's only so much that can be done in such a short amount of time)

Quote:
I don't see too many people from USA moving to Sweden and Norway, but I see plenty of immigrants wanting to come to USA.

Technically, immigrants stopped coming here once jobs dried up.

Quote:
It used to be that they came to make themselves a new life using the opportunities available here. Now, we mostly have people come here to get a handout - in-state tuition, hospital care, public schools and everything else that comes for free if you are an illegal alien.

I partially agree, I think we should be making it easier for them to become taxpaying legal aliens who can be integrated into our society, so that we reap the full benefits of the gift of a influx of happy, productive citizens.

Quote:
but we are already on the slippery slope towards socialism.

Yeah, if we start spending money on infrastructure to prevent a depression today, then tomorrow we'll be MARXISTS. There's NO DIFFERENCE. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a commu.. er, a terror.. no wait, a socialist!

We've all seen this game before.

Quote:
I think I made up my mind that he's a socialist when he openly mentioned redistribution of wealth, just like that, as if its common sense that you can steal from the most productive taxpayers to pay for his own voters' social programs.

Actually, if we were following historical rates, the top tax bracket would be in the territory of 50%-90%, rather than the current 35%. And we've also gone way off from our historical distribution of wealth since 2001 or so. That's the American Way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:48 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

GenXer wrote:
Part of the same script. Blame USA for all of the world's evils. Blame capitalism for all the world's evils. I don't think you will want to live in a socialist country where health care is socialized and where your salary and benefits are mandated by some higher authority. I don't see too many people from USA moving to Sweden and Norway, but I see plenty of immigrants wanting to come to USA. It used to be that they came to make themselves a new life using the opportunities available here. Now, we mostly have people come here to get a handout - in-state tuition, hospital care, public schools and everything else that comes for free if you are an illegal alien. Of course, this is not Obama's doing, but he will be happy to perpetuate and expand this, and given his voting record in the Senate, he supported everything along these lines, making him probably the most socialist Senator in the Senate. By himself and in 4 months he didn't do a heck of a lot (yet), but we are already on the slippery slope towards socialism. I think I made up my mind that he's a socialist when he openly mentioned redistribution of wealth, just like that, as if its common sense that you can steal from the most productive taxpayers to pay for his own voters' social programs. This is what Chavez does in Venezuela, but its not the American way.


I agree you up to the point of most productive taxpayers. Some of the wealthy get there because they are more productive but I think the upper middle class / lower upper class no longer falls into that category. It's full of doctors, lawyers, and bankers, who make a disproportionate amount of money relative to their productivity (though they are more productive). Rather than levying heavier taxes on these people, which also hits the entrepreneurs and other more productives, I'd rather see him break down the barriers that allow these people to make disproportionate amounts of money. That's problematic though because he probably gets a lot of money from them to keep it that way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group