bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

Should I buy or rent
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:10 pm GMT    Post subject: Should I buy or rent Reply with quote

We have two kids and like a house in Natick. This house could be sold in about $630000, we just did the appraisal and the appraisal price is $750000. Is that a good deal? Should we buy now or wait for a year or two?

We both have stable jobs and our rent right now is about $3000, since we rent a big luxury apartment.

Anxiously waiting for your opinion.
Back to top
melonrightcoast



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 236
Location: metrowest

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:35 pm GMT    Post subject: buy or rent? Reply with quote

Have you done the math? Can you afford the mortgage/ins/taxes/maint. AND additional utility costs? Have both you and your husband been preapproved for a loan? Do you have a 20% down payment? Do you have an emergency savings fund for six months or more of your expenses in CASH?

A lot of these questions have recently been gone over in the thread I started (asking a similar question) titled "Buy now or wait? Opinions wanted!"
_________________
melonrightcoast ... are you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:40 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Answers to your questions are all yes.

Thanks!
Back to top
Rental Lease



Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:38 am GMT    Post subject: Buy or Renew Rental Agreement Reply with quote

It sounds like you're spending only a small fraction in your rental property that you would if you bought that house you like. Now IS a great time to buy, but you might consider finding a house with a payment that's similar to what you're paying now, for a starter home. Otherwise, I'd just renew your rental agreement, and keep spending what you know you can afford.
Best of luck,

_________________
Junior
Editor's Note: Signature links removed. Please avoid overly commercial linking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:04 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget my other conditions for affordability of a house which costs 630k:
1) How much do I have saved for retirement?
2) What happens if one of us loses a job?
3) How certain am I that I'll stay in the house for the next 5 years?

If the answer is still, yes, we can afford it with EITHER one of us losing a job, AND we have saved at LEAST as much as the house is worth (if you are >50 - you probably need MORE saved than that), and we are not worried that we'd have to sell this house with $100k loss in 5 years (just an example) then we may be ok.

I do not think that anybody without retirement savings should buy a house, because essentially you would be putting all of your eggs in one basket. A luxury apartment for $3000 - this must be the most expensive 3 bedroom I've heard of. You can get a rental in Waltham/Lexington/Newton for way under that, and for $3000 it will be a 3 bedroom. A house like that will cost a lot more than $3000 a month.

It is much cheaper to rent, but if you plan to buy and blow some cash in the process, at least have all of your bases covered.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:58 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the reply. My situation is we are in the early 30s and if one of us lose job, we still can afford the house. Our monthly pay for the house incluing tax and insurance is around $3300. We both earned more than 100K. We have been saving 401K. And we do have 6 months cash cushion.

The apartment we rent is a 4 bedroom luxury in Newton. The house we are buying is 3000 squrefeet new house with views. We love it. It's a short sale.

In this case, should we buy?
Back to top
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:35 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your finances sound pretty good so here's my main warning: Homes are money pits.

Don't underestimate the cost of repairs/maintenance, which is something you don't have to deal with when you rent (and most people don't account for when purchasing). Friends of ours recently bought a place, and they've been putting tens of thousands of dollars into various projects, most of which are pretty routine. Painting the exterior of a small home shingled, for example, can cost over $10k easy. Make sure you're not going to need a new roof, etc. any time soon, or that, if you are, you're taking such an expense into account.

If you think you have good deal and you can afford (like it sounds as though you can), I think you're well positioned to buy. But make sure your time frame is 5+ years for moving again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:37 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guest: There is still a lot of information missing here. A house like that can set you back significantly. A 6-month supply of money in this economy should probably become a 2 year supply. Without having more information about your particular situation it is impossible for me to tell you whether you should buy or not. Send me an email and I may be able to help you make a decision, as this is probably the most expensive purchase you are going to make in the near future, and if you don't want to get this one wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
john p



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1820

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:38 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that running the numbers for affordability is important. A 6 month cushion is ok, but in these times, it wouldn't hurt to have a little more.

What is also important once you get the green light from the affordability exercise is to look at it from an investment perspective. I know the knee jerk reaction is "A house isn't an investment", but in light of the way things are timing the market is a smart thing. If you figure that you can afford to buy, and you put $350k out there, you might get more for that $350k in a couple of years.

Why experts are having trouble with this is that the current administration has turned on the money printing machine and no one knows how to model out the scenarios. Obama has put a lot of chips on the table and he's doubling down so many who adhere to industrious values and build wealth little by gradual are having a hard time getting their mind around this approach. I mean it was the immediate gratification folks that caused this problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:09 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

john p: Exactly what you said. To turn it around a bit, a house bought for 700k may be worth only 350k in a few years, because we do not know how the market will behave in the future. It may even be worth less. So one has to be ready for circumstances like these, to avoid the fate of millions who made the wrong bet simply because everybody around was doing the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:41 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can a house worth $700k turns to $350k? If that's the case, what's the value for old houses? My house is new and 3000+ square foot. If that happen, I think 90% of houses will be foreclosures, USA will be abandoned or WWIII already started?!
Back to top
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:58 am GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guest: The point is, nobody knows what will happen to housing prices. We are speculating here based on 'evidence' we think will help us predict the future. But what consolation will this be to you, if you run with the assumption that everything will be rosy, and everything turns out just rotten? Dont forget, this is not just the housing prices. This could happen in the following scenario. One of you loses a job, you can't afford the house anymore, you have to move, the house is worth say $500k, but you are trying to sell and there are no buyers. If you are bleeding cash, you may not have too many choices left. Do you want to test the possible outcomes? Just because you can afford it NOW doesn't mean you will be able to afford it in the future. No job is safe. And NOW is not the time to gamble with your future. What you need is a study of your financial situation which will examining different scenarios and possible ways to achieve your financial goals with different assumptions. Sometimes we don't see the mistakes we are making with our finances, and it is always good to have another set of eyes and brains to help you make the right decision. Most people make emotional decisions to buy a house, but I think a better way is to find a good financial planner who can help you make this decision. Worst case - you'll get to hear somebody else's perspective on what they think you'll be able to do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
melonrightcoast



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 236
Location: metrowest

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:37 pm GMT    Post subject: price drop Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
How can a house worth $700k turns to $350k? If that's the case, what's the value for old houses? My house is new and 3000+ square foot. If that happen, I think 90% of houses will be foreclosures, USA will be abandoned or WWIII already started?!


A house "worth" 700K can become "worth" 350K if people can no longer, or will no longer, pay 700K. With banks returning back to more historic lending principles AND people losing their jobs AND people making less money than they used to, then it is very plausible that prices will continue to go down.

Now, if prices for a new house drop 50%, which is what a house "worth" 700K turning into 350K would be, then I would say that old (not updated) houses would drop more than 50%. So that old 3000 sq ft house "worth" 500K would be "worth", say 200K, which represents a 60% drop in "worth".

Of course, this is all speculation, and there are many factors involved that make it difficult/impossible to know just how much farther prices will drop. Do I really think prices will drop an additional 50% here in Boston? No, I don't. Do I think it is possible. Yes, I do, and there are many people in CA, FL, NV, MI, and AZ that are CURRENTLY living through this 50% price drop scenario.

If I were you, and I could truly afford your house (and living) on one income AND I could live in that house for 20+ years, then I would probably buy that house. Life is a risk, and we all have to decide which risks we are willing to take. Best wishes on your decisions.
_________________
melonrightcoast ... are you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:06 pm GMT    Post subject: Re: price drop Reply with quote

melonrightcoast wrote:

A house "worth" 700K can become "worth" 350K if people can no longer, or will no longer, pay 700K. With banks returning back to more historic lending principles AND people losing their jobs AND people making less money than they used to, then it is very plausible that prices will continue to go down.

Now, if prices for a new house drop 50%, which is what a house "worth" 700K turning into 350K would be, then I would say that old (not updated) houses would drop more than 50%. So that old 3000 sq ft house "worth" 500K would be "worth", say 200K, which represents a 60% drop in "worth".

Of course, this is all speculation, and there are many factors involved that make it difficult/impossible to know just how much farther prices will drop. Do I really think prices will drop an additional 50% here in Boston? No, I don't. Do I think it is possible. Yes, I do, and there are many people in CA, FL, NV, MI, and AZ that are CURRENTLY living through this 50% price drop scenario.

If I were you, and I could truly afford your house (and living) on one income AND I could live in that house for 20+ years, then I would probably buy that house. Life is a risk, and we all have to decide which risks we are willing to take. Best wishes on your decisions.


Prices for $700k houses don't need to drop to $350k. Just the price of your house, which likely won't start WW3! New construction has a floor because its competition is generally another new house, whose cost is tied to commodities and labor. Old houses woth $700k don't have that floor. Their price is determined entirely by demand for the land they sit on and an outflux of residents from Boston could cause those prices to halve in value. Even in good times we were losing people. Boston is especially risky because so much of the value of the homes here are based on the price of land. Also keep in mind that as municipalites become poorer they may look at selling land as a way of generating revenue. The state is releasing a large chunk of land in north Waltham for example and the city has to come up with a large amount of money to buy it and keep it from development.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
melonrightcoast



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 236
Location: metrowest

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:11 pm GMT    Post subject: Re: price drop Reply with quote

balor123 wrote:
New construction has a floor because its competition is generally another new house, whose cost is tied to commodities and labor. Old houses woth $700k don't have that floor. Their price is determined entirely by demand for the land they sit on and an outflux of residents from Boston could cause those prices to halve in value. Even in good times we were losing people. Boston is especially risky because so much of the value of the homes here are based on the price of land.


So, in my mind, this is an argument against new construction because as time goes by, a newly constructed house turns into just another house. I am seeing this a bit in my target town, as there are many new constructions listed between $620K and $750K, but most sellers are putting their 15-30 year old homes on the market for $700K. And not surprisingly, the "old" homes are sitting, and sitting, and sitting. Honestly, a lot of the new construction is too.
_________________
melonrightcoast ... are you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group